Atypical identification of Lynch syndrome by immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability analysis on jejunal adenocarcinoma
© McIlvried et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Published: 10 March 2011
Lynch syndrome (LS) is a hereditary cancer condition associated with germline mutations in the mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. This condition has been traditionally described in terms of an increased risk for early-onset colorectal and endometrial cancers. Individuals with LS additionally have an increased risk to develop other cancers including ovarian, gastric, urinary tract, hepatobiliary tract, small bowel, brain, and skin cancers. The preferred method of genetic testing for LS is to initially perform microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining as a test on the tumor tissue of an affected individual. If abnormal, this testing would indicate that a germline mismatch repair gene mutation is more likely to explain the cancer and, if IHC is performed, may also indicate which gene to test first via molecular analysis. MSI/IHC has been more widely validated for colon and endometrial cancers as opposed to other cancers associated with this condition.
As we learn more about the etiology and cancer risks associated with LS, the expanding phenotypic spectrum of this condition and its genotype-phenotype correlations are being elucidated. Specifically, MSH6 mutations have been associated with a higher cumulative risk for endometrial cancer with a later age of onset as compared to other mismatch repair gene mutations [1–5], and cancers other than colon and endometrial may account for as much as 50% of cancer reported with MSH6 mutations . Clarifying the efficacy of MSI/IHC in other extra-colonic cancers associated with LS is important, since certain cases of LS are likely to present in a clinically atypical manner.
This case illustrates the phenotypic variability of this condition, and complications it may present in evaluation for diagnosis and appropriate surveillance and management recommendations. It also suggests that testing by MSI/IHC may be very feasible as a first step in LS identification using tumor tissue beyond what has been traditionally reported in the literature.
- Hendricks YM, Wagner A, Morreau H, et al.: Cancer risk in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer due to MSH6 mutations: impact on counseling and surveillance. Gastroenterology 2004, 127: 17–25. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.03.068View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goodfellow PJ, Buttin BM, Herzog TJ, et al.: Prevalence of defective DNA mismatch repair and MSH6 mutation in an unselected series of endometrial cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2003, 100: 5908–5913. 10.1073/pnas.1030231100PubMed CentralPubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hampel H, Frankel W, Panescu J, et al.: Screening for Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) among endometrial cancer patients. Cancer Res 2006, 15: 7810–7817. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1114View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hampel H, Panescu J, Lockman J, et al.: (Comment on) Screening for Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) among endometrial cancer patients. Cancer Res 2007, 62: 9603. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2308View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ramsoekh D, Wagner A, van Leerdam ME, et al.: A high incidence of MSH6 mutations in Amsterdam criteria II-negative families tested in a diagnostic setting. Gut 2008, 57: 1539–1544. 10.1136/gut.2008.156695PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Plaschke J, Engel C, Kruger S, et al.: Lower incidence of colorectal cancer and later age of disease onset in 27 families with pathogenic MSH6 germline mutations compared with families with MLH1 or MSH2 mutations: the German Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer Consortium. J Clin Oncol 2004, 22: 4486–4494. 10.1200/JCO.2004.02.033PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.