This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Unusual presentation of Lynch Syndrome
© Yu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 25 February 2009
Accepted: 03 June 2009
Published: 03 June 2009
Lynch Syndrome/HNPCC is a syndrome of cancer predisposition linked to inherited mutations of genes participating in post-replicative DNA mismatch repair (MMR). The spectrum of cancer associated with Lynch Syndrome includes tumours of the colorectum, endometrium, ovary, upper gastrointestinal tract and the urothelium although other cancers are rarely described. We describe a family of Lynch Syndrome with an hMLH1 mutation, that harbours an unusual tumour spectrum and its diagnostic and management challenges.
Lynch cancer family syndrome, also called hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC), is an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition disorder (OMIM: #14500). Lynch Syndrome carriers have an increased life-time risk of early onset colorectal cancer (24–80%) [1–3] and in women, endometrial cancer (20–60%) [1, 3–5]. Other recognised cancer risks include: transitional cell carcinomata of the renal pelvis and ureters, carcinoma of the stomach, hepatobiliary and small intestinal cancers and ovarian carcinomas. Rarely other cancers have been described [6, 7]. Sets of criteria (the revised Bethesda and the Amsterdam I and II criteria) for considering the diagnosis take into account the tumour spectrum in individuals and number of affected family members, age of tumour onset and pathological features of tumours.
Tumour predisposition in Lynch Syndrome is due to mutations in mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Though genes including hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH6, hPMS2, hMLH3, hMSH3 and hPMS1, all participate in this process, approximately 90% of the germline mutations found in Lynch Syndrome families involve hMLH1 and hMSH2 [8, 9]. More than 450 germline abnormalities of MMR genes have been described (InSiGHT, http://www.insight-group.org). The majority of these mutations are recognized as pathogenic as they result in the expression of truncated proteins. However, at least 32% of hMLH1 mutations and 18% of hMSH2 mutations, are missense variants, which cause single amino-acid substitutions and are often of debatable relevance to pathogenicity .
Inactivation of the MMR system in Lynch Syndrome, due to somatic mutation of the corresponding normal allele, results in the accumulation of DNA replication errors in tumours associated with the syndrome. This is demonstrable as variation in the length of repetitive DNA sequences (microsatellites) in tumour-extracted DNA, a phenomenon known as microsatellite instability (MSI). Many Lynch syndrome-associated tumours also manifest loss of staining of the protein encoded by whichever MMR gene is mutated, making immunohistochemistry (IHC) of tumours (often together with microsatellite analysis) a helpful first step in the evaluation of a possible MMR-deficient tumour. This may be undertaken prior to determining if mutation searching of MMR genes in germline DNA is indicated.
The case presented here illustrates unusual phenotypes, which raise questions regarding optimal surveillance protocols in this and other Lynch syndrome families.
Initial diagnoses considered included Li Fraumeni syndrome , which is associated with germline mutations in the TP53 gene, due to the presence of a sarcoma and breast cancer in the proband. Mutations in the hMSH2 gene, which had been recently cloned at that time were also considered as the paternal branch of the family including the uncles and grandfather fitted the Amsterdam I criteria. Full sequencing of the TP53 gene from blood DNA was uninformative and mutation testing for mismatch repair mutations was not available at that time. Subsequently, BRCA2 was considered a candidate gene because of the presence of male breast cancer, but no mutations were found in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 by screening of the full coding sequences of these genes with dHPLC and large rearrangement testing by MLPA.
Molecular analysis of the proband's germline DNA identified a missense variant in the hMLH1 gene (reference sequence NM_000249.2) in exon 2 at nucleotide position 200 (c.200G>A), which predicts substitution of glycine 67 with a glutamic acid residue (p.Gly67Glu). This putative p.Gly67Glu mutation segregates with cancer predisposition in nine family members (see Figure 1). The proband is currently well and has surveillance with annual sigmoidoscopy and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, annual chest wall examination, 6 monthly and PSA level measurements and sarcoma follow-up.
This case illustrates some of the challenges in assessing and managing families where Lynch Syndrome is being considered. In particular, it illustrates the potential for tumours to arise that are not regarded as classic elements of the Lynch Syndrome-spectrum and the difficulty in determining optimal surveillance protocols for such families.
In this family, the identification of two unusual tumours (male breast cancer and sarcoma) concurrently at a young age raised the question of Li-Fraumeni syndrome  as these are classic tumours from that spectrum (although breast cancer in this syndrome is usually seen in females). Although the family do not fit the classic criteria for the syndrome, they do meet Li-Fraumeni like criteria .
The fact that the breast cancer occurred in a male proband who subsequently developed prostate cancer also raised the possibility of his having an unusual presentation of a BRCA2 mutation, as lifetime risk (to age 70) of these tumours is increased to about 7% and 20% respectively [12–15]. The strength of the family history of colorectal cancer would not, however, be in keeping with the slight increases in colorectal risk seen with BRCA mutations; these are usually seen in those with BRCA1 mutations rather than BRCA2 [16, 17].
The family does, however, fit the revised Amsterdam criteria, which suggests a diagnosis of Lynch Syndrome. The evidence for pathogenicity of the missense hMLH1 variant is extensive. It includes the loss of hMLH1 protein staining in our proband's tumours and in the additional nine tumours (8 cancers and one adenoma) from his distant relatives. This loss of hMLH1 staining may be due more to a loss of antibody-specific epitope rather than an actual absence of protein expression. The co-segregation of the variant with disease similarly supports pathogenicity as does recent in vivo demonstration of microsatellite instability in a yeast model of this variant . The p.Gly67Glu mutation is not identified in 1688 unaffected controls . In addition, in-silico analysis using three phenotype predictive tools – Align GVGD http://agvgd.iarc.fr/agvgd_input.php, PolyPhen http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph/ and SIFT http://blocks.fhcrc.org/sift/SIFT.html, all support p.Gly67Glu being pathogenic.
There have been three reported cases of p.Gly67Arg mutations [19, 20] which are regarded as pathogenic because the Gly67 residue is located in the catalytic ATP-binding pocket of MLH1. This is evolutionarily highly conserved and essential for its biological function . Tumours from p.Gly67Arg are often associated with MSI, and this mutation segregates with disease.
Our proband has been previously mentioned in a report of Lynch Syndrome variants  but we are not aware of other descriptions of the co-existence of breast tumour, sarcoma, colorectal cancer and prostate cancer in a single proband with an hMLH1 mutation. Such tumours have, however, been reported in isolation in Lynch Syndrome patients. Soft tissue sarcomas have been described in Lynch Syndrome families [21, 22] and may be associated with mutations in hMSH2, hMSH6 and MLH1 [22, 23]. Male breast cancer has been reported in an hMLH1 carrier family  and the breast cancer risk for women in hMLH1 families has been reported as being increased by Scott et al.  although others have not replicated this [25, 26]. Recently, data from Barrow et al.  support a possible moderate increase in these families. Similarly, prostate cancers have also been reported in Lynch Syndrome kindreds [27, 28] but as we do not have staining information for the prostate tumours (nor for the cervical cancer) in our family we cannot know if mismatch repair was involved in their pathogenesis.
Possible explanations for the range of tumours seen in our patient could include unidentified modifier genes  that have increased his risks, but have not been co-inherited by other hMLH1 mutation carriers in his family. Alternatively, it remains possible that there is an effect specific to mutations at this location as it is noted that the closely related p.Gly67Trp mutation has also been reported in a carrier to present with colorectal cancer, brain cancer, lymphoma, leukemia and rhabdomyosarcoma .
We cannot exclude that the patient's later cancers were radiation induced; there is scatter dose and so second tumours can occur both within and outside the radiation field. Of note, homozygous Mlh1-deficient mice have increased radiation sensitivity  and increased chromatid exchanges have been induced in G2 in lymphocytes from Lynch Syndrome patients .
The glioma in the proband's niece, although rare, is a recognised element of Lynch Syndrome families, who may be referred to as having the Turcot variant.
Due to the rarity of such clinical presentations, there are few data on which to base advice regarding modifications to the screening regime for hMLH1 carriers in this family. In addition to surveillance of his gastrointestinal tract (with annual sigmoidoscopy and gastroscopy (due to his paternal history of oesophageal cancer), our patient has 6 monthly follow up of his multiple primaries with a general physical examination including that of his chest wall, and PSA levels. He has urinary cytology performed as follow up of an episode of atypia that was attributed to his prostate therapy but the value of such cytology is debatable given the lack of sensitivity demonstrated by Myrhoj et al.  and may be discontinued.
We have suggested that unaffected carriers are offered two yearly colonoscopy from 25 and second yearly gastroscopy from 35 (due to the diagnosis of oesophageal cancer in the proband's father at age 47) and that women have gynaecological surveillance with endometrial biopsy from 35 and ultrasound of the ovaries with CA125 as part of the research programme UKFOCSS (United Kingdom Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study). The screening modifications based on the cancer history specifically in the proband have included annual PSA screening from 45 and the advice that male carriers report any changes in breast tissue early, although it is difficult to know if such advice is pertinent more widely than within our proband's immediate relatives.
In summary, we describe a family kindred where an hMLH1 p.Gly67Glu germline mutation is associated with an unusual presentation of Lynch Syndrome. Identification of more families with this pathogenic mutation is likely to shed light on the mechanism for carcinogenesis in our kindred.
Written consent has been obtained by the family involved.
Family tree shown in figure 1 has been altered to maintain confidentiality without affecting interpretation of data.
We thank Dr. Nicola Andrews for performing the hMLH1 mutation testing and MSI studies in the family members. We thank Dr. Shaun Walsh who reported the IHC.
We acknowledge the MRC and the Biomedical Research Centre at The Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust for funding.
- Aarnio M, Mecklin JP, Aaltonen LA, Nystrom-Lahti M, Jarvinen HJ: Life-time risk of different cancers in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome. Int J Cancer 1995, 64: 430–433. 10.1002/ijc.2910640613View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lynch HT, Smyrk T: Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome). An updated review. Cancer 1996, 78: 1149–1167. Publisher Full Text 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960915)78:6<1149::AID-CNCR1>3.0.CO;2-5View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vasen HF, Moslein G, Alonso A, Bernstein I, Bertario L, Blanco I, Burn J, Capella G, Engel C, Frayling I, et al.: Guidelines for the clinical management of Lynch syndrome (hereditary non-polyposis cancer). J Med Genet 2007, 44: 353–362. 10.1136/jmg.2007.048991View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Aarnio M, Sankila R, Pukkala E, Salovaara R, Aaltonen LA, de laChapelle A, Peltomaki P, Mecklin JP, Jarvinen HJ: Cancer risk in mutation carriers of DNA-mismatch-repair genes. Int J Cancer 1999, 81: 214–218. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19990412)81:2<214::AID-IJC8>3.0.CO;2-LView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Watson P, Vasen HF, Mecklin JP, Jarvinen H, Lynch HT: The risk of endometrial cancer in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Am J Med 1994, 96: 516–520. 10.1016/0002-9343(94)90091-4View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lynch HT, Deters CA, Hogg D, Lynch JF, Kinarsky Y, Gatalica Z: Familial sarcoma: challenging pedigrees. Cancer 2003, 98: 1947–1957. 10.1002/cncr.11743View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boyd J, Rhei E, Federici MG, Borgen PI, Watson P, Franklin B, Karr B, Lynch J, Lemon SJ, Lynch HT: Male breast cancer in the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1999, 53: 87–91. 10.1023/A:1006030116357View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peltomaki P, Vasen H: Mutations associated with HNPCC predisposition – Update of ICG-HNPCC/INSiGHT mutation database. Dis Markers 2004, 20: 269–276.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lynch HT, de la Chapelle A: Genetic susceptibility to non-polyposis colorectal cancer. J Med Genet 1999, 36: 801–818.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Li FP, Fraumeni JF Jr: Soft-tissue sarcomas, breast cancer, and other neoplasms. A familial syndrome? Ann Intern Med 1969, 71: 747–752.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Birch JM, Hartley AL, Tricker KJ, Prosser J, Condie A, Kelsey AM, Harris M, Jones PH, Binchy A, Crowther D, et al.: Prevalence and diversity of constitutional mutations in the p53 gene among 21 Li-Fraumeni families. Cancer Res 1994, 54: 1298–1304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M, Narod S, Goldgar D, Devilee P, Bishop DT, Weber B, Lenoir G, Chang-Claude J, et al.: Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet 1998, 62: 676–689. 10.1086/301749View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium: Cancer risks in BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999, 91: 1310–1316. 10.1093/jnci/91.15.1310View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Thompson D, Easton D: Variation in cancer risks, by mutation position, in BRCA2 mutation carriers. Am J Hum Genet 2001, 68: 410–419. 10.1086/318181View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tai YC, Domchek S, Parmigiani G, Chen S: Breast cancer risk among male BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007, 99: 1811–1814. 10.1093/jnci/djm203View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Niell BL, Rennert G, Bonner JD, Almog R, Tomsho LP, Gruber SB: BRCA1 and BRCA2 founder mutations and the risk of colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004, 96: 15–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Thompson D, Easton DF: Cancer Incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 2002, 94: 1358–1365.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clyne M, Offman J, Shanley S, Virgo JD, Radulovic M, Wang Y, Ardern-Jones A, Eeles R, Hoffmann E, Yu VP: The G67E mutation in hMLH1 is associated with an unusual presentation of Lynch syndrome. Br J Cancer 2009, 100: 376–380. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604860View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Barnetson RA, Cartwright N, van Vliet A, Haq N, Drew K, Farrington S, Williams N, Warner J, Campbell H, Porteous ME, et al.: Classification of ambiguous mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes identified in a population-based study of colorectal cancer. Hum Mutat 2008, 29: 367–374. 10.1002/humu.20635View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shimodaira H, Filosi N, Shibata H, Suzuki T, Radice P, Kanamaru R, Friend SH, Kolodner RD, Ishioka C: Functional analysis of human MLH1 mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Genet 1998, 19: 384–389. 10.1038/1277View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Medina Arana V, Barrios del Pino Y, Garcia-Castro C, Gonzalez-Aguilera JJ, Fernandez-Peralta A, Gonzalez Hermoso F: Highly aggressive leiomyosarcoma associated with Lynch II syndrome: increasing the range of extracolonic cancers related with hereditary non-polyposis colonic cancer. Ann Oncol 2002, 13: 807–808. 10.1093/annonc/mdf163View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nilbert M, Therkildsen C, Nissen A, Akerman M, Bernstein I: Sarcomas associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: broad anatomical and morphological spectrum. Fam Cancer 2009, in press.Google Scholar
- Hirata K, Kanemitsu S, Nakayama Y, Nagata N, Itoh H, Ohnishi H, Ishikawa H, Furukawa Y: A novel germline mutation of MSH2 in a hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patient with liposarcoma. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101: 193–196. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00308.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scott RJ, McPhillips M, Meldrum CJ, Fitzgerald PE, Adams K, Spigelman AD, du Sart D, Tucker K, Kirk J: Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer in 95 families: differences and similarities between mutation-positive and mutation-negative kindreds. Am J Hum Genet 2001, 68: 118–127. 10.1086/316942View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Scott RJ: Modifier Genes and HNPCC: Variable phenotypic expression in HNPCC and the search for modifier genes. Eur J Hum Genet 2008, 16: 531–532. 10.1038/ejhg.2008.46View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Barrow E, Robinson L, Alduaij W, Shenton A, Clancy T, Lalloo F, Hill J, Evans DG: Cumulative lifetime incidence of extracolonic cancers in Lynch syndrome: a report of 121 families with proven mutations. Clin Genet 2009, 75: 141–149. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01125.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fredriksson H, Ikonen T, Autio V, Matikainen MP, Helin HJ, Tammela TL, Koivisto PA, Schleutker J: Identification of germline MLH1 alterations in familial prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer 2006, 42: 2802–2806. 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.024View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Soravia C, Klift H, Brundler MA, Blouin JL, Wijnen J, Hutter P, Fodde R, Delozier-Blanchet C: Prostate cancer is part of the hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) tumor spectrum. Am J Med Genet. 2003, 121A(2):159–162. 10.1002/ajmg.a.20106View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang Q, Lasset C, Desseigne F, Saurin JC, Maugard C, Navarro C, Ruano E, Descos L, Trillet-Lenoir V, Bosset JF, Puisieux A: Prevalence of germline mutations of hMLH1, hMSH2, hPMS1, hPMS2, and hMSH6 genes in 75 French kindreds with nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Hum Genet 1999, 105: 79–85. 10.1007/s004390051067PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tokairin Y, Kakinuma S, Arai M, Nishimura M, Okamoto M, Ito E, Akashi M, Miki Y, Kawano T, Iwai T, Shimada Y: Accelerated growth of intestinal tumours after radiation exposure in Mlh1-knockout mice: evaluation of the late effect of radiation on a mouse model of HNPCC. Int J Exp Pathol 2006, 87: 89–99. 10.1111/j.0959-9673.2006.00464.xView ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Franchitto A, Pichierri P, Genuardi M, De Santis A, Palitti F: Investigation of G2-phase chromosomal radiosensitivity in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer cells. Int J Radiat Biol 2001, 77: 773–780. 10.1080/09553000110050056View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Myrhoj T, Andersen MB, Bernstein I: Screening for urinary tract cancer with urine cytology in Lynch syndrome and familial colorectal cancer. Fam Cancer 2008.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.