From: Beyond the pill: contraception and the prevention of hereditary ovarian cancer
Author, Year | Location | Type of study | Study details | Exposure | Comparison | Subgroup analysis | OR, HR, RR (95% CI) | Covariates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tworoger, 2007 [48] | USA | Cohort | Overall (n = 107,900) Cases (n = 625) Exposed (64,847 p-years) | Any IUD | Ever use | All | 1.76 (1.08–2.85) | Age, age at menarche, age at menopause, BMI, oral contraceptive use, parity, postmenopausal hormone use, tubal ligation, smoking |
Wilailak, 2012 [49] | Thailand | Case-control | Cases (n = 330) Controls (n = 982) | DMPA | Ever use | All | 0.61 (0.44–0.85) | Oral contraceptive use, breastfeeding, parity, family history of gynecological cancer |
Urban, 2012 [50] | South Africa | Case-control | Cases (n = 182) Controls (n = 1492) | Any injectable | Ever use | All | 0.69 (0.36–1.32) | Age at diagnosis, year of diagnosis, education, tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption, parity/age at first birth, number of sexual partners, urban/rural residence, province of birth |
Huang, 2015 [51] | China | Cohort | Overall (n = 70,529) Cases (n = 174) Exposed (n = 39,054) | Any IUD | Ever use | All | 0.79 (0.55–1.13) | Age, education, years of ovulation, irregular ovulatory cycles, first-degree family history of cancer, BMI, physical activity, other contraceptive methods |
Any injectable | Ever use | All | 1.33 (0.58–3.04) | |||||
Soini, 2016 [54] | Finland | Cohort | Overall (n = 93,843) Cases (n = 77) | LNG IUD | Ever use | All | 0.59 (0.47–0.73) | n/a |
Jareid, 2018 [53] | Norway | Cohort | Overall (n = 104,318) Exposed (n = 9146) | LNG IUD | Ever use | All | 0.53 (0.32–0.88) | Age, parity, BMI, oral contraceptive use, menopausal status, maternal history of breast cancer, physical activity |
Iversen, 2018 [45] | Denmark | Cohort | Overall (n = 104,318; 21.4 million p-years) IUD (172,265 p-years) DMPA (7321 p-years) Implant (58,371 p-years) | LNG IUD | Curent or recent exclusive use | All | 0.84 (0.53–1.35) | Calendar year, parity, age, education, tubal sterilisation, hysterectomy, endometriosis, polycystic ovary syndrome, family history of breast or ovarian cancer |
DMPA | Current or recent exclusive use | All | 6.56 (2.11–20.40) | |||||
Any implant | Current or recent use | All | 0.51 (0.07–3.64) | |||||
Wheeler, 2019 [52] | International | Meta-analysis | 9 case-control studies 2 cohort studies Cases (n = 5133) Controls (n = 183,035) | Any IUD | Ever use | All | 0.68 (0.62–0.75) | n/a |
Balayla, 2020 [46] | International | Meta-analysis | 5 case-control studies 2 cohort studies | Any IUD LNG IUD | Ever use | All | 0.67 (0.60–0.74) 0.58 (0.47–0.71) | n/a |
Yang, 2021 [47] | USA | Pooled analysis | NECC, NHSI, NHSII | Any IUD | Ever use | All | 0.96 (0.81–1.14) | Age, body mass index, age at menarche, parity, oral contraceptive use, history of tubal ligation, family history of ovarian cancer, study center, study phase (NECC) |
Phung, 2021 [44] | Australia | Pooled analysis | 7 case-control studies Cases (n = 5064) | DMPA | Ever use | All | 0.65 (0.50–0.85) | Race/ethnicity, age, education level, oral contraceptive use duration, Parity, breastfeeding |