Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of studies assessing the relationship between circulating concentrations of sRANKL or OPG and risk of breast cancer among healthy women without a BRCA mutation [28]

From: Delineating the role of osteoprotegerin as a marker of breast cancer risk among women with a BRCA1 mutation

Author, Year

Study Source, Study Design, Sample Size

Sample Type

Study Aims

Follow-up

Population Size and Number of Cases

Results

Vik et al., 2015 [39]

Tromsø Study

Prospective cohort

n = 3174 women (range 25–85 years)

Serum

To investigate the association between OPG and risk of breast cancer incident cancer in women

Median: 13.5 years

76 incident breast cancers

RR total upper vs. lower tertile RR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.28–1.06; ptrend=0.07)

RR > 60 years upper vs. lower tertile RR = 1.10; 95% CI 0.49–2.46; ptrend=0.84)

RR < 60 years upper vs. lower tertile RR = 0.24; 95% CI 0.10–0.61; ptrend = 0.002)

Fortner et al., 2017 [40]

EPIC cohort

Nested case-control

n = 2008 breast cancer cases matched 1:1 with healthy controls (pre- and post-menopausal women)

Serum

To investigate the association between circulating OPG and breast cancer risk by hormone receptor subtype

Baseline: 1992–2000

End of follow-up: 2003–2006

2008 incident invasive breast cancer cases (1622 ER+,

386 ER–)

Top vs. bottom tertile OPG RR ER– breast cancer = 1.93; 95% CI 1.24–3.02; ptrend = 0.03

Top vs. bottom tertile OPG RR ER+ breast cancer = 0.84; 95% CI 0.68–1.04; ptrend = 0.18

Kiechl et al., 2017 [41]

UKCTOCS, Bruneck cohorts and SUCCESS trial

Case-control

n = 278 postmenopausal women

Serum

To assess whether serum OPG and RANKL are associated with increased risk of developing breast cancer

Range (cases): 5–24 months

Median (controls): 3.24 years

98 breast cancer cases

OR breast cancer in high RANKL/OPG ratio and high progesterone group = 5.33; 95% CI 1.5–25.4; p = 0.02

Sarink et al., 2017 [42]

EPIC cohort

Nested case-control

n = 1976 incident invasive breast cancer matched 1:1 with healthy controls (median age at blood collection: 56 years (range 27–77 years))

Serum

To investigate the association between serum sRANKL levels and breast cancer risk by hormone receptor subtype

Baseline: 1992–2000

End of follow-up: 2003–2006

1976 incident invasive breast cancer cases (1598 ER+)

Serum sRANKL associated with ER+ disease (5th vs. 1st quintile RR = 1.28; 95% CI 1.01–1.63; ptrend = 0.20)

No association between serum sRANKL and ER– disease (5th vs. 1st quintile RR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.53–1.44; ptrend = 0.21)

Kotsopoulos et al., 2020 [43]

NHS II

Nested case-control study

n = 297 incident invasive breast cancer (premenopausal women) matched 1:1 with healthy controls (median age at blood collection: 44 years (range 41–47 years))

Plasma

To investigate the association between plasma OPG and breast cancer risk

Baseline:

1989–1990

End of follow-up: 2009

297 incident invasive breast cancer cases

No association between plasma OPG and breast cancer risk (highest vs. lowest quartile OR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.46–1.33; ptrend = 0.30)

  1. Abbreviations: CI Confidence Interval, EPIC European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition, ER estrogen receptor, OPG osteoprotegerin, OR odd ratios, NHS II Nurses’ Health Study II, RR relative risk, sRANKL soluble receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand, UKCTOCS UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening