Skip to main content

Table 5 Response to statements about the genetic counselling experience as part of the PC screening program

From: Genetic counselling and personalised risk assessment in the Australian pancreatic cancer screening program

Statement

Strongly agree n (%)

Partially agree n (%)

Neutral n (%)

Partially disagree n (%)

Strongly disagree n (%)

Total

n (%)

I knew beforehand that I would receive genetic counselling as part of my research visit

65 (75.6)

11 (12.8)

8 (9.3)

1 (1.2)

1 (1.2)

86 (100)

Before genetic counselling, I had already read or heard a fair amount about hereditary pancreas cancer

36 (41.9)

30 (34.9)

9 (10.5)

6 (7.0)

5 (5.8)

86 (100)

The genetic counselling session was helpful to me

46 (54.1)

21 (24.7)

10 (11.8)

4 (4.7)

4 (4.7)

85 (100)

I would have preferred to have only the endoscopy procedure and not genetic counselling

8 (9.4)

4 (4.7)

23 (27.1)

8 (9.4)

42 (49.4)

85 (100)

I would have preferred more information about hereditary pancreas cancer

12 (13.8)

21 (24.1)

31 (35.6)

8 (9.2)

15 (17.2)

87 (100)

Scientists do not currently know enough about hereditary pancreas cancer to help me

11 (12.6)

22 (25.3)

32 (36.8)

14 (16.1)

8 (9.2)

87 (100)

I would recommend genetic counselling for pancreas cancer to a friend or relative with a family history of pancreas cancer

65 (76.5)

10 (11.8)

6 (7.1)

1 (1.2)

3 (3.5)

85 (100)

The genetic information was too complex

1 (1.2)

7 (8.4)

23 (27.7)

18 (21.7)

34 (41.0)

83 (100)

The written summary of the visit was useful

36 (48.6)

17 (23.0)

16 (21.6)

0 (0)

5 (6.8)

74 (100)

I will share the written summary with my family members

46 (63.0)

12 (16.4)

8 (11.0)

3 (4.1)

4 (5.5)

73 (100)

I think genetic counselling for pancreas cancer is helpful, even if the “pancreas cancer gene” has not been found

55 (66.3)

15 (18.1)

10 (12.0)

1 (1.2)

2 (2.4)

83 (100)

If the “pancreas cancer gene” were found, I would want to be tested for it

78 (88.6)

6 (6.8)

3 (3.4)

0 (0)

1 (1.1)

88 (100)

I do not think genetic counselling should be offered for pancreas cancer until the “pancreas cancer gene” has been found

3 (3.5)

2 (2.3)

14 (16.3)

15 (17.4)

52 (60.5)

86 (100)

I would be interested in another genetic counselling session when more information is learned about pancreas cancer

58 (68.2)

18 (21.2)

5 (5.9)

1 (1.2)

3 (3.5)

85 (100)

I think that the pancreas cancer in my family is caused by a gene mutation

37 (43.0)

13 (15.1)

34 (39.5)

1 (1.2)

1 (1.2)

86 (100)

I think I inherited a gene mutation that causes pancreas cancer

23 (27.7)

11 (13.3)

45 (54.2)

2 (2.4)

2 (2.4)

83 (100)

(for participants who have NOT previously had genetic testing related to pancreas cancer): Even though the “pancreas cancer gene” has not been found, I still want to get genetic testing for one or more of the syndromes discussed during genetic counselling

28 (70.0)

4 (10.0)

6 (15.0)

1 (2.5)

1 (2.5)

40 (100)

(for participants who HAVE previously had genetic testing related to pancreas cancer): I am glad that I had genetic testing for cancer risk for one or more of the syndromes discussed during genetic counselling

44 (83.0)

4 (7.5)

5 (9.4)

0 (0)

0 (0)

53 (100)

I do not feel that current genetic testing is likely to help me

5 (6.1)

3 (3.7)

20 (24.4)

9 (11.0)

45 (54.9)

82 (100)

  1. aThe most frequent response is shown in bold