Skip to main content
  • Meeting abstract
  • Open access
  • Published:

Genetic insights into breast cancer risk

Since the identification of BRCA1 and BRCA2 much has been learned about the role of mutations in these genes and how they relate to disease risk. The primary population that has been screened for mutations in these genes has been women who have a family history of early onset breast and or ovarian cancer. The tumour characteristics of women who harbour a BRCA1 mutation are similar to those identified in women who have been diagnosed with breast cancer that is estrogen, progesterone and EGFR (HER2) receptor negative, the so-called triple negative phenotype (TNBC). Screening of women with a family history that is consistent with that found in women who have a BRCA1 mutation at best yields a 20% identification rate, leaving approximately 80% of women without a diagnosis of disease. Much effort has been expended in searching for additional breast cancer susceptibility genes, which has met with limited success but the overall numbers of women with mutations in these additional genes is low and implementation of this information into clinical practice is proving difficult.

In an effort to identify additional women who may benefit from knowledge about their BRCA1 and BRCA2 status we undertook a study, using next generation DNA sequencing, examining a series of unselected TNBC patients for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. In parallel, we examined the recently identified PALB2 in the same series to women to determine how many could be accounted for by this gene.

Since a large proportion of women with a family history of disease display an identical family and tumour phenotype to women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation we considered it not unlikely that many of them possibly harbour mutations in these two genes in regions that are not typically screened for using current technologies. The results of a pilot study will be presented that suggest re-sequencing of BRCA1 and BRCA2, in their entirety, is warranted.

In summary, there is much to be gained by re-sequencing BRCA1 and BRCA2 especially given that the coding sequence represents less than 10% of each gene and the source of patients should be expanded to TNBC patients, to capture those women who do not have any obvious family history.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodney J Scott.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wong-Brown, M., Avery-Kiejda, K. & Scott, R.J. Genetic insights into breast cancer risk. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 13 (Suppl 1), A1 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1897-4287-13-S1-A1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1897-4287-13-S1-A1

Keywords