Colorectal tumour BRAF V600E and MLH1 promoter methylation status in the assessment of mismatch repair gene sequence variants of unknown clinical significance
© Parsons et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Published: 12 April 2012
Lynch Syndrome is the most common hereditary cause of colorectal cancer, caused by pathogenic mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes that result in functional defects in the DNA mismatch repair complex. Individuals identified with a pathogenic mutation are at high-risk of early onset colorectal and/or endometrial tumours. However, up to 50% of MMR sequence variants are reported to be of unknown clinical significance, creating a problem for clinicians and patients.
We are developing a multifactorial model to assess the pathogenicity of MMR gene sequence variants of unknown clinical significance. Currently this model utilizes data on tumour microsatellite instability (MSI) and family segregation analysis to assess the likelihood that a variant carrier demonstrates features expected for a carrier of a pathogenic mutation. Tumour BRAF V600E mutation and MLH1 promoter methylation are reported to be associated with MSI-H, sporadic colorectal cancer and may thus provide a strong prediction that a tumour with MSI-H status is not from a MMR gene mutation carrier.
A literature review of BRAF V600E and MLH1 promoter methylation in colorectal cancer patients was performed. Frequency of these tumour features in each study was assessed, stratified by MSI status and reported/likely MMR gene mutation status. Frequency of these characteristics was also analysed in the Colon CFR dataset, and used to estimate a likelihood ratio (LR) of pathogenicity for use in multifactorial modelling.
As expected, the literature review of 4655 individuals from 33 studies revealed a high frequency of BRAF mutations in MSI-H tumours without a MMR mutation, which increased for the subset of cases with lack of MLH1 tumour protein expression. However, BRAF V600E mutation was identified in one patient with a PMS2 mutation, challenging previous assumptions that BRAF mutation status excludes positive MMR gene mutation status. MLH1 promoter methylation data generated using a variety of experimental designs were available for only 2984 individuals from 40 studies, with inconsistencies in frequency between studies. Information was reported on methylation status of 204 known MLH1 gene mutation carriers.
Analysis of the Colon CFR dataset showed that BRAF tumour mutation status predicted MMR gene mutation status when combined with tumour MSI-H status. However, MSI-L and MSS with BRAF did not provide any additional predictive power over MSI-L or MSS status alone. The likelihood of a tumour with MSI-H and BRAF V600E positive status to be from a non-carrier was 11.55 and 9.85 for population-based and clinic-based patients, respectively. However, 4/98 (4.08%) of MSI-H BRAF positive tumours were from MMR mutation carriers.
In conclusion, positive BRAF tumour status is not a conclusive test to exclude MMR gene mutation status for patients, but BRAF-MSI tumour status is a powerful addition to multifactorial models evaluating clinical significance of MMR gene variants.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.